ARE THEY REAL MINDS THAT ARE IN UNANIMITY???

Everyday we meet people and and interactions arise between us, whether we do it deliberately or a situation arises where comments are thrown then disagreements and agreements are reached and factions are made, but comes the question are there really brains that are in Unanimity in every aspect? 

Firstly, I looked through my relations with the closest people to me from family to close friends and the circle widens on. I found out that my brother with whom I spend most of my time talking to and asking opinions on situations which I am still hesitant to come up with a final look on a subject; his views appear to be so conflicting with the views I was about to come up with. This alone makes it clear that it is so hard to find minds that are in complete unanimity. I can go on with the same example with my friends and others, but it will be mentally tiring but the important question to be asked is, is it important to reach absolute unanimity or it is unhealthy? 

In my humble view, I find it better to be far from absolute unanimity because when carrying different views on topics and being able to live peacefully with each other is what makes us different from other species. Indeed the ability to step on the differences and rise above them and connect with each others as humans is what makes us the living reasoning beings.  

I find it a apropos time to end my words saying "develop your views, avoid it from being inhumane, be ready to listen what the others have to say, respect their words, and be human". 

Writing!!! Is it much fun!

We are in a world where we are interconnected with each other in a notable way that it can be compared to the neural connections in the most dense part of the cerebrum. Everyone is dependent on what the other thinks, says, and agrees or disagrees with. There is no doubt that Individuality is a great tool of success but in this era you must connect to be able to express.



Different forms of ways have been innovated through the centuries as means of reciprocating ideas and enhancing interactions. Each way carries its pros and cons and most of these ways are hardly graded objectively, for they are subjective issues where people prefer one upon the other, and it is no right to coerce people to agree that a certain way is better than another.




Having these ideas in mind, I would like to express my inclination which is towards writing. In writing, a person finds himself immersed in front of a page or currently in front of your computer typing, where the writer is given the full means of deduction and induction and other forms of reasoning to jot down what resides inside him. I greatly feel that with writing, one is able to address the greatest range of subjects without being interrupted and being able to clearly convey the message which he needs the audience to understand. I discern the beauty of writing when I read great writings written by eminent scholars down past the ages and how they were able to address highly sensitive issues with great detail and care. Some may think that writing is a one-way flow of ideas, but they fail to realize that it is the best two-way flow where the writer during his writings feels that someone is reading him at the moment, and he tries his best to clarify doubts and elaborate where elaboration is needed. To be more specific, when the reader reads your words and finds it vacuous, the reader will seldom get back again to your writing but being able to create a powerful impact will invite the reader for another visit and with this simple example it is clear that it is no one-way flow of ideas but it is a greatly crafted reciprocation of ideas.




Coming to the other forms, I don't condemn them but I feel that they come under writing in most measures and I would let the chance to talk about what makes writing greater than the other forms by showing where do the the forms of interaction fail to reach the greatness of writing.