Saturday, April 25, 2015

Then how should we react?



I hope you weren’t sensing contempt from me. It wasn’t your belief that surprised me so much as how boldly you expressed it.

In every problem, we find those who underestimate its significance and regard the high engrossment of people into it, as a form of exaggeration. We also find those who indeed react in excess revealing upon people the sense that there is no worse calamity that might happen than this. Moreover, and to avoid simplicity, we also find those who interact in a balanced logical way. But, how can we measure the degree of severity of a situation for us to categorize their reactions? Don’t we react with things based on our former knowledge? In addition, we all believe that our reading of aspects differ due to our internal schema.
So what’s the matter?
The issue that everyone looks at a problem from his perspective and adamantly holds on his interpretation, and thinks that his interaction with it apropos. I actually think, that we as humans share a common logic or what people may call common sense, but I preferred the latter name for we in most cases agree upon certain logical statements and from it we can carry on analyzing aspects. One may find this to push the balance for the logicians but I may then use Kantian way of dealing with the matter. We can all agree a priori on morals to deal with certain aspects. No experience should be put forward in the analysis for this will mar the original background which we all could agree on, but as we involve experience, things start to detach from the objective realm and start to crawl into the subjective one.

Since I was dealing with situations that we face daily, I would think that the best thing is to expose yourself to the numerous thoughts found in the thought pool, and your brain will lean towards what it may find sound. Yes, this will also be affected by our internal schema and for sure we will like what suits our former understandings, but that is not a problem. IF we have endeavored to create for ourselves a good brain that deals with things objectively, and we had trained our mind to detach personal benefits from such issues, then for sure our subconscious inclinations will be a thoughtful one rather than an impetuous undirected one.

Monday, April 13, 2015

Mere thoughts



Sometimes we might write something and people may interpret it very differently from what we meant to express, yet their interpretations open a new possibility of thinking, and this imparts upon us the understanding that ideas are connected and they give birth to each other in various forms. We share the basic formation of reason and this connectivity allows the various interpretations, as the fine differences are the strings responsible for this variety.
I am a disorganized human that fails to appear tidy in consecutive days, as if it is part of my nature, but I always lean towards the reality that no negative aspect is perpetual, unless it is left unaddressed, keeping in mind that certain aspects that some people may regard to be negative are in their essence normal human functionalities. Our demand for things or the reflection of some kind of self-interest may be regarded to be a heinous act, by people who are good at touting good demeanor and act felicitous when the lights are casted upon them, but in reality they carry the most hideous attitudes towards their fellow beings. When someone compliments your character in a state that seems unrelated to an act you did at the moment, keep an open eye, for why he is doing so, for it might be, actually in many cases, a deliberate exploitation for a further goal by the one expressing the compliment, or he might be reacting unintentionally on psychological basis on aspects he is in oblivious about.
In many cases, we analyze people’s acts from our perspective of action, and this might be a well-refined perspective that lacks objectivity. The only thing we can do in this is to deal with humans from pure psychological understandings and build on this some presumptions, keeping in mind the fact that we as humans play in many levels of interaction and this complexity of interconnected notions makes the picture vaguer to be able to decipher the actions of some people, yet we humans due to certain drives feel provoked to try to probe the inner pushes that drove someone to act in a certain way in a certain situation.

Saturday, April 11, 2015

Random Thoughts

Some people think that they can feel what we experience, but this is a mere decorum from their side, trying to express empathy. Even an iota of what we are going through can't make its way into their faculty of experience. We are beings carrying variant amalgamations.

What is weird is that some emotions can be tragically sublime, and this may fool the ones who are throwing their vicarious abilities to share with us our feelings, but they end up in failure of comprehending the whole view. We ourselves find our logic arrested in such instances not knowing how to put our emotions in words.For instance, it can be a weird notion that casts upon our petty beings with bizarre, seemingly disconnected vibes, rendering a paralyzed faculty of perception, putting us in an embarrassing situation, that we can't even face our own selves, and we end up staring deep with strange gazes.


One may find himself engrossed striving to understand the inner alterations, but ends up mentally wasted left forsaken in a haunted abyss of disconnected and often marred thoughts.